Digital Transformation in Public Administration: Challenges and Opportunities in Indonesian Government Agencies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/harmonymanagement.v3i1.525Keywords:
Administrative Reform, Bureaucratic Innovation, Digital Governance, Digital Transformation, Public AdministrationAbstract
The digital transformation of public administration represents a critical pathway toward modernizing governance, enhancing service delivery, and improving transparency in Indonesian government agencies. This study examines the current state of digital transformation initiatives across various levels of government in Indonesia, identifying key challenges and opportunities in implementing digital technologies within bureaucratic structures. Through a convergent parallel mixed-methods design combining surveys of 245 government officials from 32 agencies and in-depth interviews with 28 digital transformation leaders, this research reveals that while Indonesian government agencies have made significant progress, substantial barriers remain including limited digital infrastructure in remote regions, resistance to organizational change, insufficient digital literacy among civil servants, and inadequate legal frameworks. The overall mean maturity score was 2.87 (SD = 0.74), placing the average agency in the 'developing' category, with only 6% reaching the 'optimizing' level. The study identifies critical success factors: strong leadership commitment (β = 0.38, p < 0.001), citizen-centric design, comprehensive change management, and effective public-private partnerships. Findings indicate that successful digital transformation requires not merely technological adoption but fundamental organizational restructuring and cultural shifts toward data-driven decision-making and collaborative governance. Policy recommendations address digital infrastructure investment, human capital development, governance reform, and shared platform utilization. This research contributes to theoretical understanding of digital government in developing nations and provides practical guidance for policymakers navigating the complexities of public sector digitalization.
References
Alrawabdeh, W. (2014). Internet and the Arab world: Understanding the key issues and limitations. International Arab Journal of e-Technology, 3(3), 137–143.
Battilana, J., & Casciaro, T. (2012). Change agents, networks, and institutions: A contingency theory of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0891
Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (Eds.). (2011). Innovation in the public sector: Linking capacity and leadership. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307520
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cordella, A., & Paletti, A. (2019). Government as a platform, orchestration, and public value creation: The Italian case. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), Article 101409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101409
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
Government of Indonesia. (2018). Presidential regulation No. 95 of 2018 on electronic-based government systems (SPBE). State Secretariat.
Heeks, R. (2017). Information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315652603
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four-stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
Lindgren, I., & van Veenstra, A. F. (2018). Digital government transformation: A case illustrating public e-service development as part of public sector transformation. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209302
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), Article 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform. (2023). SPBE maturity assessment report 2022. Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform.
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
OECD. (2020). Digital government index: 2019 results (OECD Public Governance Policy Papers No. 03). https://doi.org/10.1787/4de9f5bb-en
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of e-government: A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
United Nations. (2024). UN e-government survey 2024: Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development. UN DESA.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified theory. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
World Bank. (2020). Indonesia public expenditure review: Spending for better results. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1490-8
Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
