Analysis of User Satisfaction in Banten with Shopeepay Mobile Payment Based on E-Service Quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/globalmanagement.v2i1.40Keywords:
Satisfaction, E-Service Quality, Customer satisfaction index (CSI), Mobile PaymentAbstract
The rapid development of technology has led to innovations in various areas, including mobile payments. Mobile payments are one of the innovations in financial technology designed to facilitate online transactions. In Indonesia, there are numerous mobile payment service providers, making competition increasingly fierce. One of the popular e-wallets in Indonesia is ShopeePay, a service created by Shopee. This study aims to analyze the importance and performance levels of various electronic service quality factors and assess user satisfaction with ShopeePay. This research is a survey-based study with a sample of 100 respondents. The analysis was conducted using Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) and Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) to measure the importance and performance of each ShopeePay service quality factor and the satisfaction of its users. The results show that out of 24 ShopeePay service quality factors, 13 were considered important by respondents. The average importance rating was 4.07, while the average performance rating was 3.94. This results in a harmony between importance and performance of 97%. The Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) for ShopeePay services in the Banten area was 78.77%, placing it in the "satisfying" category. This study has several limitations, including its focus on the Banten area, a limited and homogeneous respondent group, potential bias from online surveys, and not accounting for external factors or long-term changes in user perceptions of ShopeePay.
References
Ahmed, S., Al Asheq, A., Ahmed, E., Chowdhury, U. Y., Sufi, T., & Mostofa, M. G. (2023). The intricate relationships of consumers' loyalty and their perceptions of service quality, price, and satisfaction in restaurant service. TQM Journal, 35(2), 519–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2021-0158
APJII. (2024). APJII number of Indonesian internet users reaches 221 million people. https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orang
Ayuni, A., Amanda, S. N. S., & Yusuf, A. (2021). The influence of e-service quality and brand image on continuance usage intention of DANA digital wallet platform by generation Y and Z. Indonesian Journal of Marketing Science, 20(3), 196–211. https://doi.org/10.14710/jspi.v20i3.196-211
Fahriansah, F., Safarida, N., & Midesia, S. (2023). Buy now, think later: Impulsive buying behavior among Generation Z in Indonesia. Share: Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance, 12(2), 386–421. https://doi.org/10.22373/share.v12i2.17453
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2008). Principles of marketing. Erlangga.
Muhamad, N. (2023). E-wallet, the digital payment method most widely used by Indonesian citizens when shopping online. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/teknologi-telekomunikasi/statistik/5ec97fa4c38fa8b/e-wallet-metode-pembayaran-digital-yang-paling-banyak-digunakan-warga-ri-saat-belanja-online
Nurlaili, N., Faqih, M., Faqih, M., Basri, M. H., & Larasati, K. D. (2021). Improving financial literacy in facing the era of society 5.0. International Journal of Islamic Economics, 3(02), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.32332/ijie.v3i2.4142
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 63(Special Issues), 33–44.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). ES-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156
Putri, S. N. (2024, October 7). Check the list of popular e-wallets in Indonesia: Practical solutions for modern transactions. https://www.idxchannel.com/banking/cek-daftar-e-wallet-populer-di-indonesia-practical-solutions-for-modern-transactions/2
ShopeePay. (2024). ShopeePay. https://shopeepay.co.id/
Soegoto, H., Apsarini, F., & Supandi, A. (2024). Payment system development in Indonesia. Journal of Business and Management Research, 17(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.23969/jrbm.v17i1.10416
Subiansyah, G., & Matoati, R. (2023). Analysis of user satisfaction for Go-Pay mobile payment based on e-service quality. The Management Journal of Binaniaga, 8(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.33062/mjb.v8i2.41
Sugiyono. (2022). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Sulistiyono, S., Muksin, & Iskandar, R. (2023). Measuring customer satisfaction to improve the product quality of premium seeds produced by Bintang Asia based on the customer satisfaction index (CSI) and importance performance analysis (IPA). E3S Web of Conferences, 454, 03001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345403001
Supranto, J. (2011). Measuring customer satisfaction level: To increase market share. Rineka Cipta.
Tjiptono, F., & Chandra, G. (2016). Service, quality, & satisfaction (4th ed.). CV Andi Offset.
Wattoo, M. U., & Iqbal, S. M. J. (2022). Unhiding nexus between service quality, customer satisfaction, complaints, and loyalty in online shopping environment in Pakistan. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221097920
Whimphie Billyarta, G., & Sudarusman, E. (2021). Pengaruh kualitas layanan elektronik (E-servqual) terhadap kepuasan konsumen pada marketplace Shopee di Sleman DIY. Optimal, 18(1), 41–62.
Widiarko, I. (2024). Check out 5 benefits of using a digital wallet. https://www.idxchannel.com/milenomic/simak-5-manfaat-pakai-dompet-digital
Widodo, S. M., & Sutopo, J. (2018). Customer satisfaction index (CSI) method to determine customer satisfaction patterns in e-commerce business to customer model. UPGRIS Informatics Journal, 4(1), 2447–6645.
