Effects of Perceived Organizational Support and Commitment on Employee Performance via Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Authors

  • Lisa Andriani Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Sunardi Sunardi Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Sina Setyadi Universitas Merdeka Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70062/managementdynamics.v2i3.326

Keywords:

Employee Performance, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Organizational Commitment, Perceived Organizational Support, Work Motivation

Abstract

This study aims to examine the mediating role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) in the relationship between Perceived Organizational Support (POS), Perceived Organizational Commitment (POC), and employee performance in a state-owned enterprise in Indonesia. In the context of growing public expectations for improved service quality, organizations are challenged to enhance employee performance not only in formal roles but also in discretionary behaviors. Based on Social Exchange Theory (SET), this research proposes that POS and POC can affect performance both directly and indirectly through OCB. Data were collected through a census of 138 permanent employees at PT Jasa Raharja, East Java Branch. The analysis employed Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test the hypothesized relationships. The findings show that POS has a significant positive influence on both OCB and employee performance. On the other hand, POC significantly influences OCB but does not have a direct impact on performance. The results also reveal that OCB plays a partial mediating role in the relationship between POS and performance, while it acts as a full mediator in the relationship between POC and performance. These findings emphasize the importance of fostering OCB within the organization to optimize the impact of support and commitment on employee performance. Encouraging voluntary, extra-role behaviors can bridge the gap between how employees perceive organizational treatment and how they perform. The study suggests practical implications for human resource management in public sector institutions. Policies should focus on building a supportive and engaging work climate that enhances affective commitment and acknowledges employee contributions beyond formal duties. Doing so will not only improve individual performance but also contribute to broader organizational effectiveness in a competitive and service-oriented environment.

References

Ahmad, R., Rahman, A., & Karim, N. A. (2020). The impact of organizational commitment on employee performance: Evidence from SMEs in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Business Research, 10(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.18034/abr.v10i2.470

Anam, C., & Purwanti, I. (2023). Fluid organisation: The dynamics of human capital, organisational culture, and leadership style in the era of managerial postmodernism. In Conference on Innovation in Applied Science and Technology (CIASTECH), 6(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.31328/ciastech.v6i1.5308

Anam, C., & Sopiah. (2024). Narrative review: Human capital, technology capital, digital capabilities in organizational performance SMEs in the era of digitalization. Asia-Pacific Management and Business Application, 12(Apr.), 2204139. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2024.012.03.7

Anwar, S. (2021). Organizational citizenship behavior and employee performance: A mediating approach. Journal of Human Capital Development, 14(1), 45–59.

Apriliani, D., & Wati, S. (2023). Employee engagement and organizational commitment in the digital era. Journal of Management Research, 17(1), 22–30.

Artatanaya, I. G. P., Sutrisno, A., & Wahyuni, D. (2023). Perceived organizational support and OCB: The mediating role of trust. Jurnal Manajemen Organisasi, 15(2), 125–135.

Bakri, H., & Syamsuddin, M. (2020). Organizational citizenship behavior and performance: The role of leadership and culture. International Journal of Management Science, 12(3), 56–65.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1183. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

Caesens, G., & Stinglhamber, F. (2014). The relationship between perceived organizational support and work engagement: The role of self-efficacy and personal control. Work & Stress, 28(3), 211–228.

Chen, L., Zhou, Y., & Wang, H. (2019). Perceived organizational support and job performance: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology Research, 10(1), 77–88.

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500

Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003

Gallup. (2023). State of the global workplace 2023 report. https://www.gallup.com

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Hidayat, R., & Arifin, S. (2022). Organizational support and millennial commitment: A behavioral perspective. Indonesian Journal of Organization Studies, 4(1), 33–41.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355

Kao, L., Cheng, J., & Huang, S. (2023). Social support and citizenship behavior: Evidence from Taiwan's tech industry. Asian Business & Management, 22(2), 129–148.

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

Nguyen, T. M., Pham, M. T., & Tran, Q. H. (2023). Linking OCB and job performance: The moderating effect of transformational leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(2), 175–189.

Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2

Panigrahi, R., Chatterjee, A., & Sharma, A. (2023). Commitment and performance in SMEs: An empirical assessment. Small Business International Review, 7(1), e517.

Podsakoff, N. P., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2009). Organizational citizenship behavior: A review of the construct and its implications. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(1), 1–38.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31

How to Cite

Lisa Andriani, Sunardi Sunardi, & Sina Setyadi. (2025). Effects of Perceived Organizational Support and Commitment on Employee Performance via Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Management Dynamics: International Journal of Management and Digital Sciences, 2(3), 282–288. https://doi.org/10.70062/managementdynamics.v2i3.326

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.