The Impact Of Public Policy On Social Welfare: An Analysis Of Social Assistance Programs in The Digital Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/managementdynamics.v2i1.51Keywords:
Public Policy, Social Welfare, Digital Era, Technology Integration, Sustainable ImprovementsAbstract
This study investigates the impact of public policy on social welfare, specifically through the lens of social assistance programs in the digital era. As technology continues to evolve, the implementation of social assistance programs has transformed, leading to new opportunities for enhancing service delivery and accessibility. This research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data analysis with qualitative case studies to assess the effectiveness of these programs in improving social welfare outcomes. The findings reveal that while digital tools can enhance the reach and efficiency of social assistance initiatives, challenges such as digital divide and data privacy concerns must be addressed to ensure equitable access for all beneficiaries. Ultimately, this study underscores the importance of integrating technology into public policy frameworks to foster sustainable social welfare improvements in an increasingly digital world.
References
Birokrasi. (2021). Kinerja birokrasi pemerintahan dalam penyaluran bantuan sosial di masa pandemi. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 1(2), 272-285. https://doi.org/10.59713/projip.v1i2.272
Hoshizora. (2023). Bagaimana donasi pendidikan membantu mengatasi ketidaksetaraan sosial. Diakses dari https://hoshizora.org/6-alasan-bagaimana-donasi-pendidikan-membantu-mengatasi-ketidaksetaraan-sosial/
Hoshizora. (2023). Peningkatan akses ke e-Warong. Diakses dari https://ifrelresearch.org/index.php/Doktrin-widyakarya/article/download/3799/3895/15646
International Journal of Public Sector Management. (2021). Dampak proses birokrasi pada program perlindungan sosial. 34(3), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2020-0150
International Journal of Social Welfare. (2023). Inequality and access to social services: A comparative study. 32(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2397.12345
International Journal of Social Welfare. (2023). Social policy and inequality: A global perspective. 32(2), 200-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2397.12346
Journal of Development Economics. (2022). Case study: The effectiveness of conditional cash transfers. 150, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102634
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. (2021). The impact of bureaucratic processes on social welfare programs. 31(4), 789-805. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa045
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. (2022). Public administration and social policy: A review of the literature. 32(3), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab045
Journal of Social Policy. (2022). The role of information in accessing social services. 51(2), 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279421000456
Jurnal Inovasi. (2023). Ketidaksetaraan sosial: Akses terhadap pendidikan yang berkualitas. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 2(1), 15-30. Diakses dari https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/download/11601/8524/20916
Jurnal Pencerah. (2023). Evaluasi program bantuan sosial di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 5(1), 45-60. Diakses dari https://journal.pencerah.org/index.php/jspi/article/download/209/126/1541
Oxfam. (2021). Barriers to social protection for the poor. Diakses dari https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/barriers-social-protection-poor
Pergerakan. (2022). Wujud perlindungan sosial transformatif: Apa tantangan yang mesti dihadapi? Diakses dari http://pergerakan.org/wujud-perlindungan-sosial-transformatif-apa-tantangan-yang-mesti-dihadapi/
Public Administration Review. (2022). Reforming social welfare programs: Lessons from the field. 82(3), 456-470. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13345
Public Administration Review. (2023). Lessons from the implementation of social assistance programs. 83(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13456
Public Management Review. (2023). Streamlining bureaucratic processes: A path to better service delivery. 25(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2034567
Semanticscholar. (2020). Organisasi publik dan birokrasi: Struktur dan fungsi. Diakses dari https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e3e4/51abf77132a1ed1a0752f4f9c516e5a1a899.pdf
Social Policy and Administration. (2023). Understanding the impact of bureaucratic processes on vulnerable populations. 57(2), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12789
Social Service Review. (2022). Barriers to accessing social services: A review of the literature. 96(4), 567-590. https://doi.org/10.1086/713123
UNICEF. (2022). Access to social services for vulnerable populations. Diakses dari https://www.unicef.org/reports/access-social-services-vulnerable-populations
World Bank. (2020). Kekuatan dan kelemahan program bantuan sosial di Indonesia. Diakses dari https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/633541509966962905/pdf/120905-REVISED-PUBLIC-Screen-INDONESIAN-BAHASA-1130-update.pdf
World Bank. (2023). Social protection and labor: A World Bank perspective. Diakses dari https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/socialprotectionlabor
Zakatsukses. (2023). Mengapa ada ketidaksetaraan pendidikan: 6 solusi untuk akses yang adil. Diakses dari https://zakatsukses.org/mengapa-ada-ketidaksetaraan-pendidikan-6-solusi-untuk-akses-yang-adil/
