Implementing Good Governance Principles: Administrative Reform in Indonesian Local Government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/managementdynamics.v3i2.526Keywords:
Accountability, Administrative Reform, Decentralization, Good Governance, Local GovernmentAbstract
Good governance has become a crucial framework for improving public sector effectiveness, accountability, and responsiveness to citizens’ needs. In Indonesia, decentralization policies since 1999 have devolved significant authority and resources to local governments, creating both opportunities and challenges in implementing good governance principles. This study examines administrative reform efforts in Indonesian local governments, focusing on progress, challenges, and key success factors. Using a multiple case study design, the research analyzed reform initiatives in six district/city governments with diverse contexts. Data were collected through document analysis, semi-structured interviews with government officials, civil society representatives, and citizens, as well as direct observation of administrative processes conducted between March and November 2024. The study assessed six core principles of good governance: participation, transparency, accountability, effectiveness and efficiency, equity and inclusiveness, and rule of law. The findings reveal variations in implementation across regions, with high-performing governments demonstrating strong leadership commitment, systematic planning, active citizen engagement, and effective monitoring mechanisms. However, challenges persist, including limited capacity, bureaucratic resistance, weak accountability enforcement, and low public participation. Key success factors include visionary leadership, capacity development, strategic partnerships, and institutional strengthening. Policy recommendations emphasize enhancing local capacity, accountability systems, citizen participation, and performance evaluation.
Good governance has become a crucial framework for improving public sector effectiveness, accountability, and responsiveness to citizens’ needs. In Indonesia, decentralization policies since 1999 have devolved significant authority and resources to local governments, creating both opportunities and challenges in implementing good governance principles. This study examines administrative reform efforts in Indonesian local governments, focusing on progress, challenges, and key success factors. Using a multiple case study design, the research analyzed reform initiatives in six district/city governments with diverse contexts. Data were collected through document analysis, semi-structured interviews with government officials, civil society representatives, and citizens, as well as direct observation of administrative processes conducted between March and November 2024. The study assessed six core principles of good governance: participation, transparency, accountability, effectiveness and efficiency, equity and inclusiveness, and rule of law. The findings reveal variations in implementation across regions, with high-performing governments demonstrating strong leadership commitment, systematic planning, active citizen engagement, and effective monitoring mechanisms. However, challenges persist, including limited capacity, bureaucratic resistance, weak accountability enforcement, and low public participation. Key success factors include visionary leadership, capacity development, strategic partnerships, and institutional strengthening. Policy recommendations emphasize enhancing local capacity, accountability systems, citizen participation, and performance evaluation.
References
Andrews, M. (2013). The limits of institutional reform in development: Changing rules for realistic solutions. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108393
Aspinall, E., & Fealy, G. (Eds.). (2003). Local power and politics in Indonesia: Decentralisation and democratisation. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (Eds.). (2006). Decentralization and local governance in developing countries: A comparative perspective. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2297.001.0001
Brillantes, A. B., & Moscare, D. (2002). Decentralization and federalism in the Philippines. In J. Litvack & J. Seddon (Eds.), Decentralization briefing notes (pp. 69–74). World Bank Institute.
Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Crosby, B. L. (2002). Managing policy reform: Concepts and tools for decision-makers in developing and transitioning countries. Kumarian Press.
Falleti, T. G. (2010). Decentralization and subnational politics in Latin America. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777813
Government of Indonesia. (2014). Law No. 23 of 2014 on local government. State Secretariat.
Grindle, M. S. (2007). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 25(5), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00385.x
Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising power in post-authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia perspective. Stanford University Press.
Huther, J., & Shah, A. (1998). Applying a simple measure of good governance to the debate on fiscal decentralization (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1894). https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-1894
Hyden, G., Court, J., & Mease, K. (2004). Making sense of governance: Empirical evidence from sixteen developing countries. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and analytical issues (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430). https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5430
Kristiansen, S., & Ramli, M. (2006). Buying an income: The market for civil service positions in Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 28(2), 207–233. https://doi.org/10.1355/CS28-2B
Ministry of Home Affairs. (2023). Local government performance assessment report 2022. Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia.
Norris, P. (2012). Making democratic governance work: How regimes shape prosperity, welfare, and peace. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061902
Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120–1149. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.3.1120
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
Prud’homme, R. (1995). The dangers of decentralization. World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/10.2.201
Smoke, P., Gomez, E. J., & Peterson, G. E. (Eds.). (2006). Decentralization in Asia and Latin America: Towards a comparative interdisciplinary perspective. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847200792
Tanzi, V. (1996). Fiscal federalism and decentralization: A review of some efficiency and macroeconomic aspects. In M. Bruno & B. Pleskovic (Eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995 (pp. 295–316). World Bank.
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1086/257839
UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development: A UNDP policy document. United Nations Development Programme.
von Luebke, C. (2009). The political economy of local governance: Findings from an Indonesian field study. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 45(2), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910903040004
World Bank. (2020). Worldwide governance indicators 2020. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
