Epistemology of Digital Marketing in Maritime Leadership: Bridging Intuition and Data-Driven Decision-Making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/managementdynamics.v2i2.94Keywords:
Digital Marketing, Maritime Leadership, Epistemology, Data-Driven Decision-Making, Strategic ManagementAbstract
The maritime industry, traditionally reliant on intuition and experience-based decision-making, is undergoing a transformation with the increasing adoption of digital marketing strategies. However, the epistemological foundations of this transition remain underexplored, particularly in the context of leadership and strategic decision-making. This research examines how maritime leaders, lecturers, and postgraduate students perceive and integrate data-driven marketing strategies into maritime business management. The study provides original value by addressing the gap in maritime leadership research regarding digital marketing epistemology. Unlike previous studies that primarily focus on technical adoption, this research critically analyzes the philosophical and cognitive frameworks influencing digital marketing decision-making. The primary objective is to explore the extent to which digital marketing decisions in maritime leadership are guided by empirical data rather than intuition. Using qualitative research and descriptive analysis, semi-structured interviews were conducted with maritime experts, lecturers, and postgraduate students. Data were analyzed thematically, categorizing responses into competency development, sustainability, and digital transformation barriers. Findings reveal that while data-driven strategies are acknowledged as valuable, traditional leadership models still dominate. Digital marketing adoption is constrained by limited expertise, regulatory challenges, and skepticism toward analytics. The study concludes that bridging this gap requires integrating epistemological inquiry into maritime education and fostering collaboration between industry and academia. Strengthening digital literacy among maritime leaders is essential for ensuring the sustainable and strategic use of digital marketing in the sector.
References
Akpinar, H., & Ozer-Caylan, D. (2021). Managing complexity in maritime business: Understanding the smart changes of globalization. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 32(4), 582–599.
Al-Swidi, A. K., Gelaidan, H. M., & Saleh, R. M. (2021). The joint impact of green human resource management, leadership and organizational culture on employees’ green behaviour and organisational environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, 128112.
Cascetta, E. (2013). Transportation systems engineering: theory and methods (Vol. 49). Springer Science & Business Media.
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815.
Chilisa, B. (2019). Indigenous research methodologies. Sage publications.
Cicek, K., Akyuz, E., & Celik, M. (2019). Future skills requirements analysis in maritime industry. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 270–274.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design. In Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (pp. 53–106). Sage Publications, Inc.
Hamidi, S. M. M., Hoseini, S. F., Gholami, H., & Kananizadeh, M. (2022). Blockchain Capabilities to Improve the Productivity of Maritime Logistics Processes: Review, Taxonomy, Open Challenges and Future Trends. Journal of Information Technology Management, 14(Special Issue: The business value of Blockchain, challenges, and perspectives.), 144–170.
House, D., & Saeed, F. (2016). The seamanship examiner: for STCW certification examinations. Taylor & Francis.
Katz, J. (2015). A theory of qualitative methodology: The social system of analytic fieldwork. Méthod (e) s: African Review of Social Sciences Methodology, 1(1–2), 131–146.
Kechagias, E. P., Chatzistelios, G., Papadopoulos, G. A., & Apostolou, P. (2022). Digital transformation of the maritime industry: A cybersecurity systemic approach. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 37, 100526.
Kim, T., Sydnes, A. K., & Batalden, B.-M. (2021). Development and validation of a safety leadership Self-Efficacy Scale (SLSES) in maritime context. Safety Science, 134, 105031.
Laghari, A. A., Wu, K., Laghari, R. A., Ali, M., & Khan, A. A. (2021). A review and state of art of Internet of Things (IoT). Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 1–19.
Li, X., Zhou, Y., & Yuen, K. F. (2024). Blockchain implementation in the maritime industry: critical success factors and strategy formulation. Maritime Policy & Management, 51(2), 304–322.
Melnyk, O., Onyshchenko, S., Pavlova, N., Kravchenko, O., & Borovyk, S. (2022). Integrated Ship Cybersecurity Management as a Part of Maritime Safety and Security System. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(03), 135–140.
Pantouvakis, A., & Vlachos, I. (2020). Talent and leadership effects on sustainable performance in the maritime industry. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86, 102440.
Plaza-Hernández, M., Gil-González, A. B., Rodríguez-González, S., Prieto-Tejedor, J., & Corchado-Rodríguez, J. M. (2021). Integration of IoT technologies in the maritime industry. Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Special Sessions, 17th International Conference, 107–115.
Sampson, H., & Ellis, N. (2021). Stepping up: the need for proactive employer investment in safeguarding seafarers’ mental health and wellbeing. Maritime Policy & Management, 48(8), 1069–1081.
Thanh, N. C., & Thanh, T. T. (2015). The interconnection between interpretivist paradigm and qualitative methods in education. American Journal of Educational Science, 1(2), 24–27.
Theotokas, I., Lagoudis, I. N., & Kotsiopoulos, N. (2014). Leadership profiling of ocean going ship masters. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 30(3), 321–343.
Toriia, T. G., Epikhin, A. I., Panchenko, S. V, & Modina, M. A. (2023). Modern educational trends in the maritime industry. SHS Web of Conferences, 164, 60.
Ubaidillah, A. F., Bafadal, I., Ulfatin, N., & Supriyanto, A. (2020). Cultivating marine leadership character through multicultural boarding-school system. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(1), 191–206.
Willig, C. (2014). Interpretation and analysis. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, 481.
Wilson, S. (2001). What is an Indigneous Research Methodology. In Canadian Journal of Native Education (Vol. 25, Issue 2, pp. 175–179).
Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325.
Young, C. (1995). Comprehensive Revision of the STCW convention: an overview. J. Mar. L. & Com., 26, 1.
Zaderei, A. (2020). Ensuring the sustainability of the human resources management system of maritime industry enterprises. Access: Access to Science, Business, Innovation in Digital Economy, 1(2), 146–156.
Zhao, L., Hu, R., & Sun, C. (2021). Analyzing the spatial-temporal characteristics of the marine economic efficiency of countries along the Maritime Silk Road and the influencing factors. Ocean & Coastal Management, 204, 105517.
