Performance-Based Management for Organizational Productivity Enhancement: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/managementdynamics.v2i4.405Keywords:
performance management, organisational productivity, performance-based management, organizational effectiveness, employee performanceAbstract
Performance-based management (PBM) has emerged as a critical strategic approach for enhancing organizational productivity in contemporary business environments. This systematic review examines the theoretical frameworks, implementation strategies, and empirical evidence regarding PBM systems and their impact on organizational performance from 2020 to 2025. Through analysis of peer-reviewed literature, this article identifies key mechanisms through which performance management systems influence productivity outcomes, explores organizational challenges in implementation, and proposes evidence-based recommendations for practitioners. The findings suggest that effectively designed and implemented PBM systems, when aligned with organisational strategy, employee development, and stakeholder engagement, significantly contribute to improved productivity metrics. However, success depends on comprehensive change management, adequate resource allocation, and continuous system refinement. This review provides both theoretical insights and practical guidance for organizations seeking to optimize their performance management approaches.
References
Arora, S., Chu, F., Melkinov, S., & Zhang, L. (2022). E-commerce is entering a new phase in Southeast Asia: Are logistics players prepared? McKinsey & Company, December, 1–9.
Aziz, K. A., Zulkifle, A. M., & Sarhan, M. H. D. L. (2023). Social entrepreneurship for sustainable community development: Investigating the determinants for youths' readiness. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 13(1), 444–666. https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2023.0124
Bachmann, N., Rose, R., Maul, V., & Hölzle, K. (2024). What makes for future entrepreneurs? The role of digital competencies for entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Business Research, 174, 114481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114481
Bachnik, K., Misiaszek, T., & Day-Duro, E. (2023). Integrating corporate social challenge, learning and innovation in business education. Journal of Business Research, 159, 113700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113700
Chandratreya, A. (2025). Digital transformation and the future workforce. In Transforming the service sector with new technology (pp. 19–40). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7447-4.ch002
Giordano, G. (2013). Jobs outlook. Plastics Engineering, 69(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1941-9635.2013.tb00985.x
Gomes, S., Ferreira, J. J., & Lopes, J. M. (2023). Entrepreneurial conditions and economic growth in entrepreneurial eco-systems: Evidence from OECD countries. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503231156340
Ispim, X., Conference, I., Xamk, A. S., & Sciences, A. (2024). Innovation and learning as the basis of successful service business. Proceedings of the ISPIM Conference, June.
Li, X., Qiang, Q., Huang, L., & Huang, C. (2022). How knowledge sharing affects business model innovation: An empirical study from the perspective of ambidextrous organizational learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(10), 6157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106157
Mugiono, M., Prajanti, S. D. W., & Wahyono, W. (2020). The effect of digital literacy and entrepreneurship education towards online entrepreneurship intention through online business learning and creativity at marketing department in Batang Regency. Journal of Economic Education, 10(1), 21–27.
Nájera-Sánchez, J. J., Pérez-Pérez, C., & González-Torres, T. (2023). Exploring the knowledge structure of entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 19(2), 771–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-022-00814-5
Tetteh, C., Tasavori, M., Bhattarai, C. R., Zaefarian, R., & Rajwani, T. (2024). How do environmental factors shape entre-preneurial intention? A review and future research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 20(4), 2955–2977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-024-01002-3
Wang, M., Soetanto, D., Cai, J., & Munir, H. (2022). Scientist or entrepreneur? Identity centrality, university entrepreneurial mission, and academic entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(1), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09845-6
Wardana, L. W., Ahmad, Indrawati, A., Maula, F. I., Mahendra, A. M., Fatihin, M. K., Rahma, A., Nafisa, A. F., Putri, A. A., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2023). Do digital literacy and business sustainability matter for creative economy? The role of entrepreneurial attitude. Heliyon, 9(1), e12763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12763
Yan, J., Huang, T., & Xiao, Y. (2023). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurial education activity on entrepreneurial intention and behavior: Role of behavioral entrepreneurial mindset. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(10), 26292–26307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23878-w
فهمي سليمان, ح., & احمد جاسم, ع. ا. (2024). نظام تقويمي لمستوى القدرات الحركية لتلاميذ الصفوف (1، 2، 3) الابتدائي بطيئي التعلم. Sports Culture, 15(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.25130/sc.24.1.6
